Thursday 2 October 2014

Dominion: Enterprise

Dominion: Enterprise is a Dominion expansion, which is not mine. I have had a long standing interesting in making new Dominion cards, and this is the only one of the many I have seen that caught (and held!) my interest.

I'm including the card text at the time of this review, just in case the images get lost or revised.

Clerk - $2 Action
+1 Card
+1 Action
Look through your discard pile. You may reveal a Copper from it and put it into your hand.

Really cool, very powerful for a 2 cost card. Potentially just a cantrip, but generally a Peddler for $2, that you can't stack very well. My gut says it should be a 3 cost card.

4 Stars
Jubilee - $2 Action
+2 Actions
+$2
You may pay a trade token; if you don't, return this to the supply.
---
When you gain this, take a Trade token.

Solid card. My only complaint is that it returns to the supply instead of being trashed, which makes it nigh-impossible to deplete as a pile.

4 Stars
Redistrict - $2 Action
Choose a card in your hand. Trash it, and gain a card costing exactly $1 more than it.
You may trash this, If you do, gain a card costing exactly $2 more than the chosen card.

Another pretty cool $2 card. The wording is slightly unclear, whether "the chosen card" is the one from your hand, or the one you chose to gain. I think it is worded like that so that you can gain a card costing $2 more without gaining one costing $1 more (probably most relevant trashing Gold into Province).

4 Stars
Auction - $3 Treasure
+1 Buy
When you play this, discard your hand. Worth $1 per card discarded.

Essentially a Secret Chamber turned into a treasure. It seems like it would be worse than Silver most of the time. I don't see any reason this couldn't cost $2. Also, the "When you play this" is entirely unnecessary, as is the word "Worth".

3 Stars
Convoy - $3 Action
+2 Cards
Look at the top 3 cards of your deck. Discard one, and put the rest back in any order. You may pay a Trade token to play this again.
---
When you gain this, take a Trade token.

Designed to be a self-synergy card. Decent for $3, though it seems difficult to get excited about. It probably works well with engines, as discarding a card and rearranging the other two is probably about as helpful as drawing an extra card, so it compares favourably with Smithy.

3 Stars
Floodgate - $3 Victory
2 VP
---
When you gain this, set it aside along with up to 4 cards from your hand. At the start of your next turn, put all the set-aside cards into your hand.

Pretty neat. Its use isn't immediately apparent, but it is probably amazing for late game. Instead of buying a Duchy, get a Floodgate instead, keep the $2-4 extra for next turn.

3 Stars
Gambler - $3 Action
+1 Card
+1 Action
Look at the top card of your deck and choose one: Trash that card; or put that card into your hand and trash this.

Gambler seems like the type of card you almost always want to open with. It is like a much better Lookout, and is probably a lot more fun to play with. You can even use it as a one-shot Laboratory, which can make for some interesting strategies.

5 Stars
Mill Town - $3 Action
+1 Card
+2 Actions
You may reveal your hand and gain a card costing up to $1 per Copper you revealed.

The village of the set. Pretty neat ability, it is a workshop-village hybrid. I imagine it is pretty powerful for kickstarting your deck, but falls off. Seems like it should be fun.

5 Stars
Refurbish - $3 Action
Trash a card from your hand. Gain a Silver.
---
While this is in play, Silvers produce an extra $1

Interesting. I can't say I like it that much, as I have no idea what kind of deck wants it. That being said, I've never played with it, so what do I know?

2 Stars
Committee - $4 Action
+$2
Reveal cards from your deck until you reveal 2 differently named cards. If you did, the player to your left chooses one of the revealed cards. Either trash it, or gain a copy of it. Discard the untrashed cards.

Interesting. I'm not entirely sure why the "If you did" is necessary, and some of the other wording is a bit clunky. The effect itself seems interesting enough to pique my curiosity,

3 Stars.
Craftsman - $4 Action
You may pay a Trade token to gain a card costing up to $5. Otherwise, +1 Card, +1 Action, and take  a Trade token.

The only card that can generate trade tokens not on buy/gain. I feel like it is probably a little bit weak by itself (for reasons similar to university), but much more powerful in combination with other Trade token cards.

3 Stars.
Dignitary - 4 Action Reaction
Look at the top 2 cards of your deck. Put any number of them into your hand, +$1 for each card you put back.
---
When another player plays an Attack card, you may reveal this from your hand. If you do, trash all but 4 cards from your hand.

Having followed this set for some time, I'm aware of the struggle of wording the bottom section. The current incarnation isn't bad, but presents some odd interactions with Rats and Cultist. I like the above-the-line ability, although I think there isn't any reason this couldn't cost $3.

3 Stars.
 
Recruiter - $4 Action Reaction
+$1
Gain a Conscripts from the Conscripts pile, putting it on top of your deck.
---
When another player plays an Attack card, you may discard this. If you do, gain a Conscripts from the Conscripts pile, putting it into your hand.

Interesting reaction, fairly bland action. This is difficult to judge, because it is tied in so closely to Conscripts. This feels very similar to Marauder, except that the card you get stays around (some of the time).

2 Stars
Conscripts - $0* Action Attack
+1 Action
+$2
You may reveal an Attack card from your hand. If you do, return this to the Conscripts pile and each other player gains a Curse.
(This is not in the Supply)

I might as well review Conscripts here as well; I like the idea of a one-shot attack, but I can't quite decide what it should do. Cursing seems too powerful, discarding seems too weak. Generating coins seems kind of odd, but I don't know what else I'd want it to do. I also know that this card has been through a lot of iterations, so presumably it is more reasonable than I realize, but that doesn't mean I have to like it.

3 Stars
Terrace - $4 Action
+1 Card
+2 Actions
You may pay a Trade token to discard your hand and draw 5 cards.
---
When you gain this, take a Trade token.

This card seems pretty nuts. A village that lets you do a minion-esque redraw, but with 5 cards instead of 4. It seems crazy, but the more I think about it, it is probably not overpowered, as you can't abuse it in a treasure deck (Black Market excepted), or an engine (due to limited Trade tokens).

5 Stars
Vendor - $4 Action
+2 Cards
+1 Action
+1 Buy
You may discard a treasure. If you don't, trash this.

Pretty cool. Seems overpowered, but because you have to discard treasure, the net effect is pretty reasonable. Also adds skill in knowing when to trash them, and if you want to risk playing it in a hand with no treasure.

4 Stars
Axeman - $5 Action Attack
+$2
Each other player with 5 or more cards in hand trashes a card from his hand costing at least $3 (or reveals a hand with no such cards). He may gain a cheaper card, putting it on top of his deck.

By far my least favourite card of the set. Essentially a hybrid of Pillage and Saboteur, neither of which I am a fan of, it targets high-costing cards in your hand, and replaces them with cheaper cards.

There have been multiple versions of this card, and I've hated them all. It is an ugly concept; I'm not convinced it can be fixed.

1 Star.
 
Barracks - $5 Action
+1 Action
Choose one: Gain 2 Conscripts from the Conscripts pile; or reveal cards from your deck until you reveal an Attack card, put that Attack card into your hand, and discard the rest.

Having already reviewed Conscripts, here is Barracks, the other card that uses them. I like this card a lot more than Recruiter (my issues with Conscripts notwithstanding); its cool self-synergy of gaining and digging for attacks.

4 Stars
Barrister - $5 Action Attack
Each other player reveals the top 2 cards of his deck, trashes a revealed Treasure other than Copper, and discards the rest. Gain a Treasure from the trash, or a Silver, putting it into your hand.
---
Setup: Replace one of each player's starting Coppers with a Domain.

The art on Barrister may look familiar, but is entirely a different card from my Tariff. This card has been through some iterations, and I like its current form. It is a sort of thief-explorer hybrid, and it is unusual and interesting enough to rouse my interest.

4 Stars

Domain - $3 Treasure Victory
$1
---
Worth 1 VP for every Domain in your deck.

While we're at it: Domain. Probably the best replace-a-copper-in-your-starting-deck variant I've seen. The increased cost makes it interesting for trash-for-benefit cards, and it has a neat interaction with Barrister, and its dual-type helps keep things interesting overall.

4 Stars
Barter - $5 Action
+1 Action
Trash a card from your hand. Gain a card costing up to $2 more than it. You may pay a Trade token to put the gained card into your hand.
---
When you buy this, take 2 Trade tokens.

A Remodel variant. Non-terminal, with the option to put the card into your hand. Not sure why it gives you 2 Trade tokens on the buy, though this was a deliberate buff (it used to only give 1). A solid card.

4 Stars
Cathedral - $5 Action
+3 Cards
+1 Buy
You may pay a Trade token to trash 2 cards from your hand.
---
While this is in play, when you buy a Victory card, take a Trade token.

Pretty cool. The Trade tokens seem like a pittance - being able to trash 2 cards in exchange for buying one; however, if you have multiple Cathedrals in play, you gain more than one token per buy. You can probably set up some really cool combos with this. Also, it seems kind of weird you have to trash exactly 2 instead of up to 2.

4 Stars.
Conclave - $5 Action
+1 Action
Reveal the top 3 cards of your deck. From the revealed cards, choose an Action card, a Treasure card, and a Victory card. Put those cards into your hand and discard the rest.

So freaking cool. A sort-of-Cornucopia Laboratory variant. Love it.

5 Stars.
Fund - $5 Treasure
$2
When you play this, you may trash it. If you do, +1 Buy and gain a Silver, putting it into your hand.

One shot money. Neat, solid, but doesn't seem too exciting (though probably a cool combo with Barrister)

3 Stars
General - $5 Action
You may play an Action card from your hand twice; when you would trash or otherwise remove that card from play during your Action phase, don't. When you discard that card from play, you may put it on top of your deck.

I like the concept of play twice now, once later, but I firmly dislike the cannot be removed from play business, and am not 100% sold on the wording. I'd much prefer it as a simpler Throne room with automatic Scheming.

2 Stars with the potential to be 4.
Wheelwright - $5 Action
Discard any number of cards. Draw until you have 7 cards in hand. Each other player may gain a Copper, putting it into his hand.

I really like this card. Discard-and-Draw-Up-To is a concept I had been trying to do, but between this card and Archivist, I don't think I can come up with anything better. 

5 Stars.


Overall: 4 Stars
1 Star - 1
2 Star - 3
3 Star - 8
4 Star - 9
5 Star - 5


Thursday 17 July 2014

Keeping Players in the Game

Keeping players in the game is a tricky task.

The first thing you need to avoid is player elimination. Knocking players out of the game is generally a bad thing, you can only really get away with this if it is both necessary to the game, and if the game is short enough that players don't mind waiting for the next round.

The next obstacle is logical elimination. This is where players can fall so far behind that they have no chance of winning. Even if they're technically in the game, if they have no hope of victory, they might as well not be playing. You need to allow players to have some method of catching up and making comebacks so that everyone can stay engaged. This is sometimes referred to as "rubberbanding"; where a player who gets too far away from the pack gets snapped back towards the median.

There are two forms of rubberbanding: you can either give people that have fallen behind an advantage, or you can impose a penalty on anyone who gets too far ahead. The latter method, I like to call "Blue Shelling" and I generally dislike it - it seems fundamentally wrong to punish the players for doing well.



Comeback Mechanisms should be a subtle thing, as you generally don't want to reward players for losing so much that they would prefer to be in last place. You generally want to avoid just handing them points, and instead give them small advantages that let them get their game plan back on track.

Once you have a game that allows all players to be strategically engaged (by not eliminating any players, logically or otherwise), you need to ensure that players can be engaged by the mechanics themselves. One of the worst offenders for this is long turns that only involve the current player. Players zone out, waiting for their own turn, and then take extra time to figure out what happened while they weren't paying attention.

There are a lot of different ways to combat this, such as:
  • The simplest method is to just have turns short enough to keep players from zoning out. If long turns are inevitable or unavoidable, consider reducing player count, so that it at least gets back around faster.
  • Having multiple players playing simultaneously. There are a variety of ways to do this; Scattergories, Bananagrams, and 7 Wonders are all good examples of simultaneous play.
  • Giving people things to do during their off-turns. 
    • In Risk, you roll defender dice when you are being attacked
    • Puerto Rico has everyone participate in whatever action is being taken
    • Kingdom Builder gives players enough information to start planning their next turn before it happens. 
    • Taboo has a player paying attention and buzzing out players who use any of the "taboo" words.
    • Even simple tasks can keep players engaged, giving players "busy work" can sometimes actually make it more engaging and fun.
  • Allowing player interaction such as Trade or other negotiations
  • Making whatever action the player is taking inherently interesting enough to keep players' attention. The most obvious example would be from games like Cranium or Charades, where players actually perform and do things. 
  • Making paying attention to the opponent's moves inherently important. A game like Mascarade is an excellent example, as if you don't pay attention, you'll have no idea what is going on.

All in all, there are a lot of things to consider to maximize player engagement. You not only have to keep them strategically engaged by letting everyone have a chance at victory, but also focussed on the game at hand, even when it isn't their turn.

Thursday 3 April 2014

Fossil Updates

I've been doing some work lately to address the faults of Fossil. The basic concept was novel and fun, but the game was swingy, not deep enough, didn't scale well, and felt too short.

Here is a list of "patch notes" on the recent changes:


  • Increased the number of tiles. This has gone from 72 to 120. I have also rebalanced the tiles to include more monsters and rooms to keep things more interesting.

  • I have reworked the digging mechanic to scale better with more players. They now roll 1D6 per opponent, and take tiles equal to the lowest number rolled.

  • I have redone the monsters. I now use a deck of small monster cards that you can put on the tiles. This allows for a greater variety of monsters, as well as more detailed and interesting ones. It also solves the long-standing problem of how to represent monsters on the board (previously with ad-hoc dice or token representations). 

  • I have also rebalanced combat. The way it worked before was very all-or-nothing, and while fun, was not that interesting. I have changed it to a system I like calling "chip damage"; monsters now have an Attack stat that determines how much damage they deal, rather than the remainder of their health. This also opened up a lot of opportunity for more interesting monsters for the cards mentioned above.

  • The items have also been reworked quite heavily. They were very swingy before, cards like Mimic and Treasure Chest (which let you draw 2 and 3 treasure cards respectively) combined with high-value powerful-effect cards (like Boots of Travel, which gave +1 movement and was worth $3) could potentially give you $10 from a single lucky drop. All the most powerful items were reworked into "Abilities", which give powerful enhancements to your miners, but cannot be sold for money. In addition, the "draw extra treasure" cards have all been nerfed to give 1 fewer than before. In addition, many others have been reworked to be more useful. I still need to add more loot, but this has been a good start to the item reworks

  • I have also reworked the Miners, by adding Classes. You now start the game with 1 Scout, 2 Miners, and 1 Heavy. Scouts can move up to 5 spaces, but only have 2 Strength (which serves as HP/Carrying capacity). Miners can move 4, with 3 Strength. Heavies can only move 3, but have 4 Strengh, and get +1 damage in combat. On average, this has increased the speed of your workers by 1 space; which was also partially done to counteract the larger maps brought about by having more tiles.

I am quite happy with the rework thus far, and I look forward to continuing it, as these changes have been a huge step forward in addressing the issues facing the game. 

Thursday 20 March 2014

Dominion - Potion Cards

Alchemy is undoubtedly the most controversial expansion in Dominion, no doubt due to the awkward nature of the Potion cost cards. All of what follows is my humble opinion, on Potion cost cards from a design perspective.

Because each Potion cost card (hereafter PCC) may end up being the only PCC on a given board, it is understood that every potion card should be able to stand on its own as a worthy addition to a deck. However, this means that unless you plan on buying many copies of it, you have introduced an otherwise worthless potion card into your deck for a single PCC. This is bad, so logic follows that any PCC you get, you should want several copies of. What follows in turn, is that the PCC should therefore be a valuable or integral part of your deck.

I think Alchemist demonstrates this perfectly; mediocre by himself, but incredibly powerful with enough of them. Indeed, most good PCCs define the deck they are put in. It is my opinion that self-synergy should be a common feature among PCCs.

As a side note, it is also my opinion that a certain self-synergizing card would be better off requiring a potion:
Like Alchemist, Minions have incredible self-synergy, and define almost any deck they are a part of. They are powerful to the point that they almost cannot be ignored on most boards that they are a part of, and I believe that integrating a Potion into its cost would help make this more of a strategic decision and less of a reflex.

The card that I have made that best demonstrates this behavior is Shaman, who can chain multiple copies from your discard pile to rack up coins.

I intend on adding more Potion cost cards to my fan expansion, and I will be following the design principles outlined here.






Thursday 13 February 2014

Playtest Report - Tinker (and Shaman)

I was able to get some testing in on Distant Colonies, and I played the following kingdom:




My intent was to test Tinker, and see if it was a reasonable concept. This seemed like a good board for it, as it had lots of similar cost cards, and even some 2 cost ones to swap out estates for. It even has tinker's evil twin: Swindler.

I opened Swindler/Tinker; in the hopes of colliding Tinker with an estate to make an Embargo, and using Swindler to start polluting my opponent's deck. I wanted to embargo the treasures, as unhindered BM should beat this deck. In the end, it was a very close game, with the Tinker deck narrowly beating a Hermit-BM strategy.

I feel like I have a reasonable handle on how to use Tinker now, and what his strengths and weaknesses are:

Works With:
  • Strategically timed cards (Smugglers, Counting House, Tournament, Potion to a lesser extent)
  • Engines, especially draw-your-deck engines and megaturn engines
  • Tactician
  • Cards at similar price points
  • Good $2 cards (for turning Estates into)
  • Draw-up-to cards
  • Limited use cards (Sea Hag, Chapel)
  • Cards that benefit from being trashed (Rats, Catacombs, Squire, etc.)
  • It is useful for cleaning up curses
Conflicts With:
  • Silver
  • Lack of powerful drawing power
Ultimately, Tinker has a lot of uses, but it is a fairly weak card. It is essentially a dead card in your hand, and in most cases is not useful until at least the mid game. In order to get it reliably paired up with cards you want to exchange, you need quite a bit of drawing power; a lot in fact. Drawing most or all of your deck is probably a good idea.

In most cases, it would be faster and easier to just buy what you want in the first place, rather than use Tinker to swap cards for what you want. Barring really good $2 cards on the board, or trading coppers for Ruins in a Scrying pool deck, you will almost always be slowed by down by Tinker. Use it wisely and it can help you, but buy it carelessly and you will suffer for it.











Thursday 30 January 2014

Distant Colonies - Tinker


Tinker is a concept I have had in my head for some time now; it has a few variations, but the concept stays the same of being able to exchange cards tactically.

Its value as an opener depends on the board; if there is a good 2 cost card (and it is not a shelters game), it is great to exchange your estates for them.

In the midgame, it can be useful to swap out engine parts in order to have an ideal amount of +action vs +cards in any given hand. It is also useful for swapping out cards whose usefulness has expired or diminished. (Sea Hag, Chapel, etc) or cards whose benefit occurs on buy/gain (IGG, Inn), or just any card that benefits from being trashed (Squire, Rats, Catacombs, Fortress).

In the late game, it can be used to swap cards for Duchies (or Platinum/Peddler for Provinces), or maybe just deplete piles by trashing and exchanging.

It is definitely a card I want to play around with; it seems to have a bunch of interesting uses. I actually just thought of something interesting; use it with fortress to gain the entire stack of tinkers at once. Whether you are massing up cards, or just piling out, it potentially puts the entire stack in your deck.

Thursday 23 January 2014

Playtest Report - Tariff

Tariff plays pretty much exactly the way I wanted it to. It was designed as a combination of Harvest and Tribute, and performs that duty pretty much to a tee. In an engine, you can almost count on it giving at least +1 action along with up to +3 other things.

I picked a random kingdom that included Tariff, and I rather liked it:


It has a lot of interesting card interactions; I think City was probably the only card that I didn't end up using in my test games, as there isn't really enough time to empty a stack to make them worthwhile. Platinum and Colony are optional, though I think I preferred the board without them (though maybe that's when I should have gone for City!).